Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Don Daynard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Paul August ☎ 20:53, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
It seems every radio announcer in Toronto in the last 10 years has been given a stub. Not all radio announcers are notable enough for an international project like wikipaedia Delete--Porturology 08:04, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
keep. four articles link to it, and wikipedia has no shortage of space for text I believe Astrokey44 09:16, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep. Some of the recent wave of Toronto adult contemporary radio edits are excessive - say, I'll take this moment to strip the redlinks to the midday and swing shift hosts at CJEZ - but Daynard's stature in Toronto and in Canadian radio broadcasting is, like him or the middle-of-the-road music stations he's worked or not, iconic. A leading morning radio host in Toronto over decades. We have credible articles on less famous Toronto radio hosts, a few of which I've largely written (eg. John Sanford Moore, Mark Elliot). Samaritan 12:39, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I've expanded the article to include his Toronto radio morning shows since the 1960s, roles on television, and his role in the international hit film Porky's. Samaritan 14:41, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Keep Due to the length of time that Daynard spent on the air in Toronto and his popularity this article should be kept. Niloc 14:11, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- While I generally agree that local radio hosts shouldn't get Wikipedia articles unless they have some kind of extra notability, Don Daynard -- who has that extra notability -- is the wrong person to pull out as an example of a non-notable local radio host. Other than Daynard and Erin Davis, however, I'm personally unconvinced that anybody else at CHFI actually merits their own article. A lot of the edits in question were done by a user whose edit history is excruciatingly problematic. Keep this one, but don't turn it into a precedent for keeping local radio hosts. Bearcat 17:28, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Bearcat. -- DS1953 19:08, 17 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Bearcat has summarized the issue well. Mindmatrix 18:08, 19 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Samaritan and Bearcat. Ground Zero | t 19:31, 20 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per those above. The man is second only to Andy Barrie in my appreciation of Toronto morning radio. Radagast 23:58, 24 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep ··gracefool |☺ 17:29, 25 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.