Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Asgardian/Workshop
|
Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk) Case clerks: AlexandrDmitri (Talk) & Seddon (Talk) Drafting arbitrators: KnightLago (Talk) & Steve Smith (Talk) |
 | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
Question
[edit]I assume I'm an "other party," but I'm not really sure. If so, should I add comments to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Asgardian/Workshop? I see areas like "Past dispute resolution" and "Belittling editors" -- are these the places where we can place "Proposed findings of fact ... supported by evidence on the evidence page," as per Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration#Workshop. Thanks for helping me understand the guidelines; I'd hate to inadvertently complicate the page. -- Tenebrae (talk) 00:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- When BOZ proposed I start posting on the Workshop page, I asked the same question, he replied thus. Nightscream (talk) 01:46, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, I concur - if you want to make proposals of your own (and if you have any you wish to make, I encourage you to do so), my advice works for you as well. You may also post in the "Comment by parties" section for any item that myself and/or Nightscream has posted thus far. BOZ (talk) 01:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Agree with above. I am currently reviewing the evidence and plan on posting to the workshop towards the end of this week. KnightLago (talk) 02:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Still working. I am going through a lot of old differences, which has proved very time consuming. I hope to have something up ASAP. KnightLago (talk) 18:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- It's OK - there is a lot to look at. :) BOZ (talk) 19:16, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Still working. I am going through a lot of old differences, which has proved very time consuming. I hope to have something up ASAP. KnightLago (talk) 18:50, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
- Agree with above. I am currently reviewing the evidence and plan on posting to the workshop towards the end of this week. KnightLago (talk) 02:27, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
- Yep, I concur - if you want to make proposals of your own (and if you have any you wish to make, I encourage you to do so), my advice works for you as well. You may also post in the "Comment by parties" section for any item that myself and/or Nightscream has posted thus far. BOZ (talk) 01:55, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
Ditto. I provided a lot of those diffs, so I can wait. Nightscream (talk) 17:13, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
- I have recruited Steve Smith (talk · contribs) to help comb through everything and try and wrap this up ASAP. The delay remains due to the volume of evidence, not the nature of the decision. KnightLago (talk) 18:38, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
- Your dilligence is appreciated! BOZ (talk) 19:16, 18 March 2010 (UTC)